The NESACS Blog
From the Northeastern Section of the ACS, focusing on career management and development
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
April 2019
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
11/16/09
Academic Position. Teaching Philosophy 2.
Filed under: Position Searching, Public Relations docs, Post-docs
Posted by: site admin @ 1:17 pm

What are some necessary criteria for
a person
to review and comment on
a Teaching
Philosophy statement a
member has created?

(1) Has he taught relevant post-
high school
courses with scientific
content? 
(2) Has he
written his own
teaching philosophy and
reviewed
and commented on other peoples’

statements?
(3) Is he willing to read and assume the
author has integrity?

With this out of the way, when I review
teaching philosophies, it takes me about
10 ‘read-throughs’ to adopt the mind of
the author. 
COMMUNICATION SKILLS  It is critical
that teachers be gifted communicators
who
can appeal to their audience in
the first
paragraph, or even the title. 
Think of Tom
Friedman the NYTimes
columnist, for example.


Communications must lead through
story-telling
and factual example to a
logical and ‘telling’
conclusion in excellent
composition and form.  [These are
academics, after all.]

The author must also bear in mind
who the
intended audience is.  The
audience
analysis of the written word
probably needs
to examine the institution’s
mission statement
, core values and
student body.  So, a statement
to a
research oriented large class size
university
might not fit with a liberal
arts institution
or a military academy,
as extreme examples.


SUGGESTIONS
Visit the university, speak with people
who have written successful statements,
and submit your drafts to people who
have
the critical background mentioned
above.


Sure, it may be possible to create your
own
document by reading through
power points
of ‘how to’s’  but I have
seen only one of those
– not mine!

CONTENT:  Refer to
1
                         

Leave a Reply