Washington Post writer provided worthwhile guidance
on attention we should give to news stories.
1. Peer Review source. Peer review can take time.
Faster release happens with preprints, containing “RXiv”
as in MedRXiv and BioRXiv and ChemRXiv
are not peer
2. Confirmation bias can inform our reading both for
and against a report.
3. Correlation is a suggestion, not definite proof, tested
4. Experimental results should be compared to honest
and reflective control experiments. Double blind controls,
sample size of experiment, subgroup interpretations,
nature (dose, animal vs. human, etc.) of test too.
5. Headlines, source and big names can dominate.
6. Political headwinds can blind science or technical report.
Leave a Reply