From the Northeastern Section of the ACS, focusing on career management and development

December 2011
« Nov   Jan »
Mid-career professionals: Interviewing questions
Filed under: Interviewing, Leadership, Mature professionals
Posted by: site admin @ 12:10 pm

Geoff Smart and Randy Street published a handy
book outlining critical questions mid-career
and senior level professionals should be
prepared for.

They cite early in the book “Who:  the A method
for hiring
” Jim Collins’ line:  “the most important
decisions business people make are not WHAT
decisions, but WHO decisions.”

They define a “player” as a candidate who has
at least 90 per cent chance of achieving a set
of outcomes that only the top 10 per cent of
possible candidates could achieve.

They point out four sources of these “players”:
  - referrals from trusted networks
  - referrals from employees
  - friends of the firm
  - trusted recruiter sourcing systems.

Smart and Street cover quite a range of interviews
and tactics to select top talent–
  1.  four kinds of interviews and their questions
screening, top-grading, reference, selling
  2.  red flags to look for in interviews
  3.  behaviors Marshall Goldsmith seeks to avoid
  4.  legal traps.

Comments contain question topics.

1 comment
Correlation does not mean Cause and effect. Pharmaceutics
Filed under: Position Searching, Observ. Trends
Posted by: site admin @ 11:46 am

Striking examples of learning from the failures of
a series of cause and effect correlations in treatments for
human disease and disorders are given in Wired,
January 2012, p. 102 - 109, by Jonah Lehrer.
‘Trials and Errors:  Dead end experiments, useless
drugs, unnecessary surgery.  Why science is failing us.’

Lehrer writes about unintended consequences in:
  - cholesterol lowering torcetrapib (Pfizer)
  - B vitamins reducing homocysteine-linked cardiovascular
Situations from more information from tests not producing
expected outcomes in:
  - non specific back pain caused by swelling or degenerated
discs, revealed by MRI

Lehrer offers these as breakdowns in scientific correlation. 
However, I offer that the ‘business perspective’ of correlation
and the ’science perspective’ of correlation are different. 
Harford states this more clearly in his book, ‘Adapt’.

Harford’s arguments in Adapt
that scientific experts are
continuously humbled by what they predict or believe and
the truth or outcome.  Lehrer, while a very compelling writer,
might be overstating the case made by linking a series of
correlations to the development of a business outcome. 

There are things to learn though in Lehrer’s article about the
industry and approaches to meet customers’ needs.
Lehrer provides examples where a change in R&D
approach is what job seekers should consider in
companies to work for.  The business paradigm has
limited validity in complex scientific correlations such
are used in traditional pharmaceutic development.

1 comment