Question of several colleagues:
How would you respond to the question:
Why did you leave your last employer?
What I tell potential employers:
I had brought what I was working on to a
reasonable transition point, and I am looking
for new challenges. The only thing I added
was that we got new senior management
and that I had done all I could to advance
the project management discipline.
The message is that I didn’t agree with the
new regime. It usually stops there with nods
of understanding, and I haven’t said anything
disparaging about my former employer. If
I’m pressed, I say that there wasn’t a
consistent idea throughout the new
leadership team about what the project
management approach should be.
Hope that helps. See you in Chicago.
The signals I get when I “hear” this response is
an experienced person has a formal way of completing
projects. He had moved the project to a satisfactory
level of completion. New management came in and
felt the need to either change direction, stop the project
or bring a specific person in for the next phase of the
This person has a formal style he describes as
his project management approach that might have
been different than what new senior management
felt was how to move projects to completion.
Dana Matioli, in a recent post on how to respond to this question
offers six good factors to keep in mind, many of
which R. displayed nicely.
- Be brief.
- Be up front and honest.
- Don’t display non-professional behavior or offer negative comments.
- Don’t use overused cliches that does
not show the true reality of job change in US
- Assume responsibility for things that did not
work and indicate how you have learned from
- Be prepared for follow-up questions, like
If you stayed with the company, what would your next move be? or
If you had things be different, what would they be? or
What would you like to see different in your next position
In some cases, “R.’s” remarks above might
reflect a degree of inflexibility. That translates
into motivation, tactics and working with people
(customers, clients, or upper management more
than project team members).
Matioli’s article offered strong comments that
money and shorter commute might not be
arguments to offer.
The article offered some nice considerations
relating to wanting to work for a firm where
you could use newly acquired skills or skills
you love to use. In other words, express the
desire to move on to their position which
fulfills your needs.
Any other thoughts to mention?